1) Preventing his lawyers from contacting him is unreasonable, even if the motivation for putting him in solitary were reasonable (bad behavior on his part) and there is no other form of mistreatment occurring.
2) You asserted the presumption that they had good reason to have him in solitary. I challenged it, as there is no cause to believe they have good reason.
3) I am upset that you: a) argue repeatedly against things I have not said - like "Past guilt is not proof of current guilt."
and b) raise unrelated issues to muddy the waters - like the "conspiracy theory" crap.
no subject
2) You asserted the presumption that they had good reason to have him in solitary. I challenged it, as there is no cause to believe they have good reason.
3) I am upset that you:
a) argue repeatedly against things I have not said - like "Past guilt is not proof of current guilt."
and b) raise unrelated issues to muddy the waters - like the "conspiracy theory" crap.