Legacy

May. 6th, 2011 11:30 am
joshwriting: (Default)
For all that one may wish to live forever, truth be told, we can only expect to live on in the impact we have on other people.

There are those like Jesus or Buddha whose footprints on the future are huge. Shakespeare, Aristotle, etc.

But for lesser luminaries - especially those whose published works are limited (to non-existent), our person-to-person connections are the best we can normally expect.
*********

To a limited extent, the Internet has changed this. Anybody can put up verbiage or images that live on past her or his lifetime. This is not to suggest that it is all that likely, but the hope is there. The chance exists.

My mother's published works are limited in scope. What Can We Do With Blocks, What if Tiny Little Dinosaurs Played House, and other such works, entertaining as they are, tend not to be the sorts of things that people go looking for - and, even when they find them in English or French, they tend not to be life changers.

So, it was with a great deal of pleasure that for the first time, it was one of my mother's pieces that I've put on line that prompted contact from a desperate parent seeking help. Normally, it is my work on underachievement that catches the attention, and Patterns for Charlie gets read as an afterthought if at all.

Her work matters. This is not news to me.

That it matters to others and will for years to come puts a smile on my face.
joshwriting: (Default)
By Professor John Yudkin
Department of Nutrition, Queen Elizabeth College, London, UK

(The essay below was written in response to a request to examine the future path of food and nutrition. It is a tad dry. And a lot of it seems obvious. I think it is worth the read, anyway. If nothing else, skim to the bolded segment and last paragraph.)
*****

One thing is certain about the food of the future. In spite of the almost universal belief that we shall sooner or later be eating pills, we shall in fact have to eat the sorts of foods which need a plate, knife, fork, and spoon. The amount of protein, fat, and carbohydrate which our bodies need every day, with its mineral elements and vitamins, even if pure and dry, weighs something like one pound. This would make up a hundred or so quite large pills, and I doubt whether this is quite what people have in mind when they imagine food in this form.

On the contrary, what is becoming more and more clear is that people will only eat food which is palatable to them – food which is pleasant to look at, to smell, to taste, and to chew. And indeed it is within this context that, before (then), we shall have deliberately to make changes in our food if we are to escape considerable hazard to our health. For the food manufacturer, with all the resources of science and technology, is increasingly able to make attractive foods, with tastes, colours, and textures which we find increasingly irresistible, but which may be nutritionally useless or even undesirable.
About 750 more words below the cut )

The kicker is that this was written in 1964.

The problem is not that we did not know what was going to happen. As ever, the problem is a lack of willingness to address what we did know was going to happen.

Profile

joshwriting: (Default)
joshwriting

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
131415 16171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 22nd, 2025 11:06 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios