joshwriting: (Default)
[personal profile] joshwriting
A question on Sheroes asked "How did you come to your beliefs?"

After many years of studying and reading about different religions, including the one I was ostensibly raised in, and after prayer seeking guidance (and a clue), and after conversations with priests, reverends, rabbis and shamans...

I concluded that I have nary a clue, nor any chance (in hell) of finding one.

I am a devout agnostic, dedicated to the principle that I do not and cannot know what is going on with deities.

I do pray, though...

p.s. If I listed my mood as contemplative every time I LJed, I suspect it would not be inaccurate.

Re: Other

Date: 2005-02-07 01:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] laughingjudge.livejournal.com
I see it as a real-world issue. You cannot pray to something if you do not believe in that thing. This is a very pronounced problem if you believe in nothing.

Re: Other

Date: 2005-02-07 01:14 pm (UTC)
dpolicar: (Default)
From: [personal profile] dpolicar
So, the first part of your answer answered my question -- it's a real-world issue. Cool.
The second part makes it sound again like you're just defining your terms... and the third part really puzzles me (are you seriously asserting that anyone in the real world believes in nothing?)... but I think I'll stick with the first part.
Thanks for clarifying.

For my part, I think it's entirely possible for someone to withhold belief in deity but still direct their will with results equivalent to what a theist obtains by prayer. Consequently I don't think there's any real-world distinction in this space between what is available to a theist and what is available to an agnostic.

But it's always nice to know we actually disagree about something in the world, and aren't just diddling around with the definitions of words.

Re: Other

Date: 2005-02-07 06:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] laughingjudge.livejournal.com
But arguing over definitions is fun.

Re: Other

Date: 2005-02-07 10:20 pm (UTC)
dpolicar: (Default)
From: [personal profile] dpolicar
No problem with that, though I don't disagree with your definitions per se (merely with the implication that the distinction between them is particularly important) which makes argument difficult. It just helps to know which game is being played.

Re: Other

Date: 2005-02-08 06:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joshwriting.livejournal.com
But I don't believe in nothing.

I am unconvinced of nothing, either!

Re: Other

Date: 2005-02-08 08:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] laughingjudge.livejournal.com
For purposes of this argument, I was not considering anyone who does believe in something; just those who believe in nothing.


You are unconvinced of nothing...
So you are convinced of everything? (or at least something?)

Re: Other

Date: 2005-02-08 03:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joshwriting.livejournal.com
Isaac, I am very confused by your confusion.

I do not believe in something. I do not believe in everything. I do not believe in nothing.

I have one belief - that I do not know what is the truth.

This means prayer might have value and might not.

I suppose I am fairly convinced that it is unlikely to do harm.

But if it does no harm and might do good, then why not?

Think of it a something akin to having a coupon for a free lottery ticket.

There is no expectation of winning, and you might not go out of your way to get the ticket - but if you are in the store with the lottery tickets, anyway, then what is the cost of getting a free ticket?

Profile

joshwriting: (Default)
joshwriting

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
131415 16171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 12th, 2025 04:31 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios